A real rebuild, verified: 4 issues caught before launch

We asked an AI to rebuild roboticforce.io from scratch. The result looked right, but the first scorecard failed 4 of 7 checks: SEO at 55/100, accessibility at 80, responsive at 79.85%. Six fix-and-re-run iterations later, it passed all seven. Every step is below.

Original vs AI Rebuild

Same content, same layout intent, different codebases. On screen the rebuild is convincing; the failures only show up in the checks.

Original site Production
Screenshot of the original roboticforce.io homepage hero section showing the live production site
AI rebuild First pass
Screenshot of the AI-rebuilt version of roboticforce.io homepage, which appears visually similar but has underlying issues

First pass: 4 of 7 failed. Final pass: 7/7.

Four suites failed on the first pass - including SEO at 55/100. Six iterations later, every check passed.

First pass - 4 failures
Responsive
79.85%
SEO
55/100
Content
97/100
Performance
87/100
Accessibility
80/100
Functional
100/100
Image quality
80/100
Final pass - 7/7 all clear
Responsive
85.53%
SEO
98/100
Content
98/100
Performance
96/100
Accessibility
100/100
Functional
100/100
Image quality
98/100

The rebuild looked fine. Same layout, same content, same structure. The scorecard told a different story: SEO signals dropped to 55/100 (nearly half the meta data was wrong or missing), responsive broke at two breakpoints, and accessibility regressed with new WCAG violations. None of that is visible by looking at the page, which is why the checks exist.

Six rounds from fail to ship

Each round: the AI fixes what the scorecard flagged, re-runs the suite, and checks the new numbers.

1

First pass

AI builds the rebuild from screenshots and design tokens. It looks plausible, and the first scorecard fails 4 of 7 checks.

responsive 79.85% seo 55/100 a11y 80/100 image 80/100
2

Fix round 1

AI reads the pixel-diagnosis report. Fixes missing meta tags, adjusts responsive breakpoints, adds alt text to images.

3

Fix round 2

Responsive improves. SEO climbs. Accessibility still has issues - heading hierarchy and ARIA labels need work.

4

Fix round 3

Heading hierarchy fixed. ARIA labels added. Image comparison shows remaining layout shifts at tablet width.

5

Fix round 4

Tablet layout locked. Image optimization pass - compression and sizing aligned with original.

6

Fix round 5

Final adjustments. Responsive at 85.53%. All remaining edge cases resolved.

7

Final pass - clear to ship

Every suite at or above target. The rebuild is verified pixel-perfect at four breakpoints with SEO, content, accessibility, performance, and functionality all intact.

responsive 85.53% seo 98/100 a11y 100/100 image 98/100 content 98/100 perf 96/100 functional 100/100

Original vs verified rebuild - full page

Scroll the full-page screenshots. The rebuild preserves the layout, content, and visual structure of the original.

Original - roboticforce.io
Full-page screenshot of the original roboticforce.io website
Production site, captured before rebuild
Verified rebuild - 7/7 passing
Full-page screenshot of the AI-rebuilt version, verified pixel-perfect by MigrateKit
AI rebuild, verified by MigrateKit at all breakpoints

What the demo run showed

The AI produced a convincing rebuild in minutes, and it would have shipped with an SEO score of 55/100 - nearly half the meta data wrong or missing. That failure was invisible on screen.

The scorecard turned it into a fix list. Each round: read the scorecard, fix what failed, re-run, check the new numbers. Six iterations later the rebuild passed all seven checks.

The exit condition was a passing scorecard, all seven checks.

Run the scorecard on your next rebuild

Send the old URL and the new URL. The scan starts immediately and the pass/fail verdict appears on the page.

The scan starts immediately and the pass/fail scorecard appears on this page. No account needed.